Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jelani Sarr vs Govind Nanda Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sarr vs Nanda analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On This Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Jelani Sarr vs Govind Nanda Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Sarr 0 - 0 Nanda
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sarr has won 52.1% of points on their second serve, while Nanda has won 43.2%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sarr, in recent form, has won 50% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nanda has won 54.26%. The same stats for first serve returns are 24.56% and 40.57% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sarr has saved 84.62% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nanda has saved 53.49% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sarr has won 66.67% of matches played (W/L 8/ 4), with Nanda winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sarr has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 15/ 7), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 44% (W/L 4/ 5). Nanda has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 28/ 17), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Sarr has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 8/ 4), where as Nanda has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 3/ 2). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sarr has played against opponents with an average rank of 59.75 while Nanda has played against players with an average rank of 188.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sarr has won 25% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nanda has won 100% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sarr has converted 53.85% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nanda has converted 47.73% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
20
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
835
Rank
339
High
23
Age
R
Plays
Form
61% (19-12)
Career Total W/L
58% (115-82)
80% (8-2)
YTD W/L
60% (3-2)
$0
Career Prize Money
$56,390
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Jelani Sarr vs Govind Nanda For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Sarr VS Nanda
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-6(5) | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jelani Sarr | Govind Nanda |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 80% (8/2) | 60% (3/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 77% (17/5) | 50% (6/6) |
| Games Win/Loss | 58% (136/100) | 50% (53/52) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 80% (8/2) | 60% (3/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.26 | 0.45 |
| Aces Total | 30 | 23 |
| DFs per game | 0.03 | 0.1 |
| DFs Total | 3 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 71.7 | 188 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (183/302) | 63% (211/336) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (130/183) | 65% (137/211) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (62/119) | 43% (54/125) |
| BPs Won% Total | 54% (7/13) | 48% (21/44) |
| Return Pts W% | 33% (83/253) | 45% (169/373) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 80% (8/2) | 60% (3/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 80% (8/10) | 60% (3/5) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 89% (9/8) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 11% (9/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 50% (4/2) |
Jelani Sarr Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Peter Bertran
Player
Jelani Sarr
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
70)
5
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jelani Sarr
Player
Miles Jones
67%
(
65 of
97)
1st Serve %
73%
(
54 of
74)
10
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
72%
(
47 of
65)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
42 of
54)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
7%
(
1 of
14)
35%
(
34 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
25 of
74)
88
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Taha Baadi
Player
Jelani Sarr
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
62%
(
49 of
79)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
0%
(
0 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
24 of
79)
68
Total Points Won
70
|
1-6 7-6(3) 10-7 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jelani Sarr
Player
Karl Poling
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
10
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
62
Total Points Won
56
|
6-1 3-6 13-11 | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Govind Nanda Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Govind Nanda
Player
Alexander Petrov
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
65%
(
57 of
88)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
7
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
49 of
88)
88
Total Points Won
61
|
4-6 6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bernard Tomic
Player
Govind Nanda
47%
(
33 of
70)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Govind Nanda
Player
Bruno Kuzuhara
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
82%
(
68 of
83)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
41 of
68)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
83)
88
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Govind Nanda
Player
Jerry Roddick
61%
(
60 of
98)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
11
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
43%
(
42 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
88)
98
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Govind Nanda
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
15 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Kotzen
Player
Govind Nanda
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Govind Nanda
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
57%
(
20 of
35)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
45%
(
24 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Govind Nanda
Player
Huzaifa Abdul Rehman
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
27 of
48)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Govind Nanda
Player
Thomas Brown
61%
(
61 of
100)
1st Serve %
76%
(
64 of
84)
10
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
37 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
84)
91
Total Points Won
93
|
7-6(4) 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kyrian Jacquet
Player
Govind Nanda
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Sarr Vs Nanda Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Sarr are available here and Nanda photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Govind Nanda
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
